Click cover to enlarge it
Who can judge a person’s reactions during stress situations? The prisoners of war who give in to their captors’ demands, the kidnapped heiress who joins forces with her abductors — both must act without past experience to guide them. Both must make decisions in a vacuum, without benefit of familiar people or situations to guide them. The end result can be either a very negative or a positive experience.
In FAMILY IN CHAINS, Roxanne Marshal rinds herself and her family in just such a situation. Held captive in an isolated mountain cabin, she not only meets her captors’ sexual demands but, to her horror, finds herself responding to them. Roxanne and her family are forced to indulge in acts that are not only forbidden by society, but also by their own moral code. Yet, in spite of their shame, they turn the experience into a positive one, uniting them as a family.
This is a shocking story, the story of one family’s reaction under stress. Yet who are we to judge their response?
“Nungh!” The sound came from the grassy mound across the meadow. “No! Damn it, no! Not again. Not so soon!”
“Don’t tell me no, you stupid little cunt! Fucking is all you’re good for. If you don’t fuck, you don’t eat. I might even fix it so you can’t open your Goddamned mouth!”
A loud, ringing slap echoed across the valley. The noise came from a thin slit in the side of a large mound, a dark, narrow opening half hidden behind a clump of brush. The mound was the roof of a sod house, a dome of timbers and planks built over a huge pit hollowed out of the ground. The planks had been covered with earth and a layer of sod, disguising it almost perfectly. It seemed to be a natural feature.
Fictional reading for entertainment purposes only.